From ken@kenhall.ca Thu Nov 26 10:24:32 2015
Subject:Re: Updated Numa V1 with Windows

I never had a chance for an A/B comparison but I have owned both. I
really liked the sound of the Numa 1, and the Numa 2 also sounds
excellent but it was slightly less inspiring to me to play. I can't
put my finger on what the difference was but it seemed as though the
Numa 1 made me want to just keep playing it and the 2 sounded fine and
did the job. I think the keybed was a slightly nicer feel as well. The
Numa 2 was definitely friendlier on the upgrade front but it was weird
too. While we're discussing Studiologic stuff, does anyone out there
have a VMK 161 with the waterfall keys and if so could you confirm
whether or not it will transmit the high trigger point?

Thanks,

Ken

> I would be interested in hearing how you think it sounds too.. I
> recall reading on another forum that a few people didn't like the
> sound of the II as much as the original. I could be mistaken but I
> recall someone saying it sounds compressed or something like that??
> However, I liked the sound of the demos I heard.
>
> Craig
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Nov 26, 2015, at 12:51 PM, squawkbx5@yahoo.com
> [CloneWheel] > > wrote:
>
>> how is the actual sound difference between the two ? i've read that
>> you can hear that it's
>>
>> not a keyb sound engine . is that good or bad , or just different ?
>