interesting stuff , i'll try the 8's
On 9/19/2013 5:45 PM, Ken Hall wrote:
They just seem a little tighter sounding and I get a
better stereo field. Of course, this is just my opinion.
I use whichever pair I'm not playing my rig through for PA
with a sub so I've had lots of opportunity to try both.
I always play with a bass player, which definitely is part
of my choice. Both have more bass response than I need.
Ken
On 19/09/2013 5:38 PM, squawkbx5@...
wrote:
yea I've heard that before , how would you say they differ from the
10's ? are the mid's a little sweeter or are they just
a little less bottom heavy ?
--- In CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com,
<clonewheel@yahoogroups.com>
wrote:
I have a pair of K10s
and a pair of K8s and I like the 8s better for organ
- go figure!
Ken
On 19/09/2013 5:20 PM, squawkbx5@...
wrote:
I guess i'm at a loss here , I recently
demoed my numa through both the k-10's and
the new ev's ( the 12's ) both in stereo ,
didn't care for either one , the qsc's
sounded better but definitely not enough
to make a purchase , don't think my mojo
will sound much better through these
speakers , both of them sound pretty
rippin through a 3300 though , guess i'm
still searching for that elusive stereo
headphone sound , sigh