From ljabaa@yahoo.com Sun Jan 13 20:55:00 2013
Subject:Re: CX3 v2 vs XK3C

I also agree. I am happy with my CX3 except for the upper octave harshness. I also would go for the Mojo but I don't need the extra manual or weight. I am close to springing for the  Numa but am leary because so many have had problems with it (both software and firmware). Now I begining to think about the Hammond SK1. Does anyone know if Studio Logic has remedied the problems with the Numa?
Leo


________________________________
From: thomas pacho
To: "CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 4:26 AM
Subject: RE: [CWSG] Re: CX3 v2 vs XK3C

I agree with Dennis. I have a CX3 and I'm not switching to something else until I can afford a Mojo of Key B Duo because I could use 2 manuals. The high end is a little harsh, but with the right EQing, it sounds (to me) great and the layout is close to a B3.

To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
From: den121961@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:50:36 +0000
Subject: [CWSG] Re: CX3 v2 vs XK3C

 

If you had the Korg for a while, and it isn't satisfying you I'd say switch. The negatives I've heard about the XK3C have all had to do with the leslie sim which you aren't using. The guys that use them seem to love them, and all us guys that use the Korg usually complain about the harshness. Bottom line is if you aren't happy with the sound of the Korg, you're not going to enjoy playing. And why do all this if you can't enjoy it?

--- In CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com, jwkeeley56@... wrote:
>
> I need opinions on whether I would gain by switching from Korg to Hammond . I run Korg into Speakeasy preamp into PRO 145 .....Thanks John
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]