From gabru@comsec.net Sun Nov 18 10:22:13 2012
Subject:RE: MS 3X + pa system or Neo Ventilator + pa system on nord c1?

Frederick,

I am going to guess that A is the MS rig. With all of the reverb it is difficult for me to tell. Without the
reverb and with a little drive I think it would be easier to tell them apart. Your playing is superb and
thank you for the nice demo. Both sound good. How are you interfacing the Nord to the 142?

Gary

From: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Frederick Somerville
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2012 3:29 AM
To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CWSG] MS 3X + pa system or Neo Ventilator + pa system on nord c1?

Gentlemen

Here are two examples from my living room.

The grear used is
Nord C2d
Leslie 142
MotionSound Pro3tm + LowPro
a behringinger ultrabass 90 direkt from a line out without any effects
lowpass filter at 250.

In one clip only the Motionsound rig

In one clip both systems all of the units above.

Zoom Q3 in the middle of the room.

Which recording is which? :)

http://www1.tripnet.se/~flm/hammond/test/A.mp3

http://www1.tripnet.se/~flm/hammond/test/B.mp3

With your answer I would like to hear the reasoning behind your conclusions.

Last question - The clip with the single motion sound rig, is this a usable
sound? - if not, then why?

BTW way - moving air? All speaker move air. Not moving air = silence
Mechanical Rotating speaker system is probably a better name for what we
call "moving air"

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]