From rafael2pop@yahoo.com.ar Sun Nov 18 09:08:58 2012
Subject:Re: MS 3X + pa system or Neo Ventilator + pa system on nord c1?


Guss that something here needs a bit of precision.

When many of us say "moving air" we're not about speakers , headphones in general
output lineal transducers.

Agree that a real Leslie when recorded becomes in the same thing as a  simulated Leslie like the Vent or is
other digital si options.

What can be said is that in a small/medium venue where can be heard mechanical sound from a rotary
speaker then "moving air" describes better what it's heard directly from a speaker cone.

Using as a comparison de polar charts of microphones, can be said that a real rotary cab as producing
Doppler effect "omni waves"  that are simplified when sent to anything called "simulator /sim"

Agree than when  a real  Leslie , Motion-Sound, etc. power amp isn't enough and routed to a P.A. then can be said that
is almost the same as they'll come from speakers in a "directional/cardioid way" 

The fact should be named "stationary vs. rotary sounds"

In the end when hearing a mp3 or a youtube, agree that rotary or simulated rotary should be almost the same and closer one to each other.

But hearing real Leslie complex waves it's like a "omni pattern" 

Never will be the same experience as hearing the organ thru a simulator.  Isn't just better: is quite different to ears.

Again , to clarify : valid only for rehearsal and small venues

The actual rotary sound is so distinctive that if should I would had to hear a Ventilator in 1969 probably I wouldn't buy it.

Didn't got interested in any phasing effects by the time.

Only the Vibratone rotary speaker grabbed my ear's attention

Best,

Rafael

Re: MS 3X + pa system or Neo Ventilator + pa system on nord c1?
Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:01 am        (PST)        . Posted by:
"j a"         hammond321  



Yes... all speakers move air. Anything that makes a sound
moves air. I was going to mention that in my original comment, but
thought that putting "move air" in quotes would be sufficient to get the point across without having to actually point out that I'm aware of the fact that a speaker cone moves air.