From mskremote@yahoo.com Fri Jun 22 07:24:08 2012
Subject:Re: VB3 1.4 v 2.0 was mojo/vb3 vibrato

>>My gutters have needed cleaning for a year.- Cleaned mine only 6 months ago and was going to do them again this weekend but you have inspired me to to defer and work on the synth part for Jump instead.

I wonder whether there are any substantive differences between 1.4 and CE 2.1 other than CE 2.1 being tweaked and optimised for the Mojo hardware and XP setup. Note Crumar refer to VB3 CE 2 (CE standing for Crumar Edition I guess), the updates announced by Crumar to CE2.1 all appear to relate to functional items and bug fixes - there is no mention of "enhanced leslie sim" for example.

There is so much user accessible tweaking available for 1.4 that maybe VB3 CE 2.0 is a marketing illusion that Guido has created for Crumar as part of the licensing agreement he has with Crumar with the intent of differentiating the software running a  $2,500 keyboard from the VSTi available for $65.  I guess Guido is pioneering a new era of commercial realities in having a both a VSTi and a hardware board available in the market concurrently. The other hardware manufactures don't offer a VST alternative to their hardware. We could sure have some fun if Nord were to release the C2D software as a VST' for $65.00 as well a having it available as hardware for for $4k.

Bobby what significent improvements would you like to see to VB3 1.4?

Cheers

Mark 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]