From tsellers@knology.net Thu Jan 12 21:18:59 2012
Subject:Re: Vent vs 145

Talk about overkill.....
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Richmond
To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: [CWSG] Vent vs 145


Not that I've tried it, but I trust Wayne. Here's another option if you
really want
lows from a folded horn. Check out the 12 Pi.

http://www.pispeakers.com/Hornsub.html

From: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of John Ferguson
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 5:19 PM
To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CWSG] Vent vs 145

My thought too.

For the home use, over in a virtual organ group, several of our guys are
using the House Wrecker design for really effective low bass down to 16hz.
These can use two or up to four 15" speakers mounted in pairs with each pair
facing each other and wired out of phase with each other so that they really
pump air. I've read reports that these can literally levitate carpet. Has
anyone here tried them? What do you think if you have?

John

----- Original Message -----
From: B Carr
To: clonewheel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: [CWSG] Vent vs 145

Bet it's got tons o' thump, but probably defeats the purpose of going with
smaller, lighter amplification gear. Don'tcha think? :-)

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

_____

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1416 / Virus Database: 2109/4138 - Release Date: 01/12/12

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]