From bcarr22@hotmail.com Thu Jan 12 16:16:49 2012
Subject:RE: Vent vs 145


Bet it's got tons o' thump, but probably defeats the purpose of going with smaller, lighter amplification gear. Don'tcha think? :-)



To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
From: dsurkin@optonline.net
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:09:08 +0000
Subject: Re: [CWSG] Vent vs 145



How about one of these added to the mix, so you can reproduce the low C with the 32' stop?
http://www.cerwinvega.com/pro-audio/folded-horn-subwoofer/ts-42.html

--- In CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com, B Carr wrote:
>
>
> 2 each - QSC K12 or QSC K10
>
>