From jackoverfull@gmail.com Wed Feb 01 17:02:39 2012
Subject:Re: Nord C2D

Good point: supporting older products diverts developers from writing new code.

Il giorno 01/feb/2012, alle ore 22.42, Gary Brumm ha scritto:

> This is one thing that Kurzweil excels in. Their legacy support and product upgrades are the best in this industry.
> It would be nice if more manufacturers felt this way….but there is no money in writing new firmware….the only thing
> gained is a stellar reputation…..most companies just sell the next model and dis-own their past……
>
> From: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jackoverfull
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:36 AM
> To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CWSG] Nord C2D
>
> I agree that updating the old hardwareis a good thing, a good thing that many companies should consider. I wonder what are the hardware differences that prevents the C1 to be updated. Perhaps a very different board?
>
> Not that I actually care for my rig (never had a Nord, will surely not have one for many years, if ever), I'm just interested in the general "cloneheel" topic.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]