From frederick.somerville@gmail.com Wed Feb 01 14:34:00 2012
Subject:Re: Nord C2D

Can you describe the difference I will hear. What should I listen for?

Witch Electro by the way should I use for comparison?
The Electro 3 has the same organ engine as the C2 if I am not totally
misinformed.

Now I own an Nord C1 and a Nord C2 and I have the VB3 1.4.
These I am very familiar with I spent countless hours practicing and
gigging on them.
I have done A/B tests with C1/C2 Vb3 1.4 against a B3 in a Leslie 147.
So given those parameters I would be very interested in hearing your
opinion of how the C2d differs from the Mojo?
Now I have some slight recollection of you stating that you have not yet
heard the C2d live. But please do enlighten me on what I would hear if I
compared the Mojo (of which I only know from some quite good recordings by
the makers) to the C2d.

2012/2/1

> No, I did not hear it live at NAMM, but according to clavia it did not
> have the complete sound engine installed. And I am not saying that it
> sounded bad, just not state of the art. Listen to the Mojo, then to the
> Electro or C2D. Or a ventilator. You will hear a difference.
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frederick Somerville
> Sender: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 23:13:53
> To:
> Reply-To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [CWSG] Nord C2D
>
> From the official postings from Clavia I can not see any excuses.
> If you are reffering to the earlier post it is not an official statement
> from Clavia as far as I can see.
> The only official things from Clavia as far as I have seen is on their
> webpages and what was said at Namm.
>
> And you did not answer my question.
> Have you personally heard the C2d live at Namm?
>
> If you judge the C2d by the sound of the vids ........
>
> 2012/2/1
>
> > I have heard the various videos from NAMM and the direct out recording
> > posted on the Keyboard Forum. It was not that impressive.
> >
> > My criticism certainly has nothing to do with supporting and upgrading
> old
> > products. I commend Clavia for doing that. I just have issues with
> > companies hyping a new product and not delivering at NAMM... Then making
> > excuses.
> >
> > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frederick Somerville
> > Sender: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:59:05
> > To:
> > Reply-To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [CWSG] Nord C2D
> >
> > David - have you heard or played the C2d?
> >
> > 2012/2/1 David Jacques
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > > I just find it extremely boring when a company presents a NEW HYPED
> > > product at NAMM... and when it does not receive overall enthusiastic
> > > response, the company
> > > starts making excuses like "well, it does not yet have the NEW Leslie
> > > simulator"... or "of course it does not yet include the NEW key
> click"...
> > > Give me a break! They would have been better off just not turning it
> > > on....
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: B Carr
> > > To: clonewheel@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 9:00 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [CWSG] Nord C2D
> > >
> > > Ditto.
> > >
> > > Wonder how many people choose not to join in discussion for fear that
> > > their comments will be ripped to shreds by someone's un-called for
> > pompous
> > > response? How many more people might join in the discussion? The
> guy's
> > > contributing information that many, if not all of us are interested in.
> > > Can't we at least hear it before we start with the snide comments?
> > >
> > > Nothing personal, HammondDave, but I doubt this is a product you'd ever
> > be
> > > interested in anyway. So why spoil everyone else's fun? Just because
> > you
> > > CAN?
> > >
> > > Geez!
> > >
> > > To find out the real truth about Phil Cannella go to
> > > www.truthaboutcannella.net
> > >
> > > > To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> > > > From: bobbysimons@optonline.net
> > > > Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:49:57 -0500
> > > > Subject: Re: [CWSG] Nord C2D
> > > >
> > > > On Feb 1, 2012, at 11:46 AM, hammonddave2004@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > YAWN…
> > > >
> > > > Why don't you take a little nappy-poo? Some of us find it
> interesting.
> > > > We'll wake you if we need another similarly useful opinion.
> > > >
> > > > Bobby Simons