From james_eaton@btopenworld.com Mon Mar 28 21:41:38 2011
Subject:Re: Crumar/ ergonomics

Interesting all the comments about ergonomics now that the tone from clones
is so good, and isn't it GREAT to have yet more competent double manual
clones in the marketplace. Big thumbs up to new entrants!



In general though regarding the feedback on the control placement, one thing
I personally think any serious Hammond B-3 clone manufacturer - especially a
double manual clone - should consider is with each deviation from the
original user interface design is - why am I doing it?



I've watched with a little disappointment every time I've seen clone after
clone come out lacking in some essential performance control somewhere or
other, from details such as saving rotary speed into the preset or suchlike,
to missing the whole pedal section off.



Overriding aspects of a B-3 from the "customer's" point of view then:

- drawbars in front, 2 sets per manual, pedal drawbars in middle, UM
to left, LM to right - 1934 onwards

- drawbar selectors and presets to far left - 1934 onwards

- V/C on the left - from 1938?

- Leslie speed control on the front rail - 1948?

- percussion on the right - from 1954



Some bi-products of this happy arrangement

- room on the top for a piano or synth

- Relevant drawbars closest to the free hand

- Easy preloading of sounds still faster than pretty much any other
keyboard since its invention



Starting in 1934 this has been the formula that makes up Hammond consoles in
a format that has been played for what is rapidly approaching 80 years. It
is a de-facto standard. We're discussing essential parts of what defines a
B-3.



Hammond-S and Clavia both moved their controls to the same place as on a B-3
after customer feedback regarding on clones. And H-S added more sets of
drawbars.

Korg put 2 sets of drawbars on a single manual keyboard and put their
controls into the B3 position.

H-S have also developed a complete clone of the original instrument
including woodwork.



I'm just thinking that in 2011 if I was building clone I'd be thinking I'd
have to have a pretty good reason for doing it any differently?



James

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]