From tonysounds@yahoo.com Fri Dec 16 12:33:22 2011
Subject:Re: BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

Of course he could (and would, if he had 2 channels).
 
But you were espousing the glory of the high/low system, and stacked cabinets, and that's where the raised eyebrow comes in.
 

"The meek shall inherit nothing."  -FZ 
"Hitting 'play' does not constitute live performance." -T
www.myspace.com/tonyorant

________________________________
From: M T
To: "CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [CWSG] BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

 
Tony,

I'm a little confused. If both the top and bottom rotor simulations are mono, couldn't the house guy take both signals and mix them how he wanted, just like he would with a top and bottom mic?

________________________________
From: tonysounds
To: "CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [CWSG] BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

 
Panning (upper) left and (lower) right is one thing; panning horizontally as you remarked just seems....well, unles you're playing in the Grateful Dead in 1973, with the Owsley System, pointless.

"The meek shall inherit nothing."  -FZ 
"Hitting 'play' does not constitute live performance." -T
www.myspace.com/tonyorant

________________________________
From: M T
To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com; CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [CWSG] BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

 
Tony,

Why would that be so much different than micing the top and bottom of a Leslie? If I were the house guy, I might like not having to deal with the potential feedback issues and being able to control the highs and lows independently. Both signals are mono, so you wouldn't be dependent on a stereo house.

Mitch

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]