From hammond321@yahoo.com Fri Dec 16 09:09:59 2011
Subject:Re: BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

And if you start lugging cabinets around to stack, why not just use a Leslie to begin with?



________________________________
From: tonysounds
To: "CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com"
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [CWSG] BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up



 

Well, in all honesty, while it sounds like a great idea, and will be awesome onstage with stacked cabinets (especially if you can stack them at ear or chest height), through a PA, or in recording, that is about as useful as tits on a bull. 

"The meek shall inherit nothing."  -FZ 
"Hitting 'play' does not constitute live performance." -T
www.myspace.com/tonyorant

________________________________
From: "hammonddave2004@yahoo.com"
To: Clonewheel Group
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [CWSG] BRe: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

 
I think the separate high/low rotor outputs is an inspired idea! That's how a real leslie works, isn't it? O am surprised that it took this long for a manufacturer to figure it out.

Shame on H/S for allowing a small, Italian company to punk them! VIVA ITALIA!!!
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: MRK7421@aol.com
Sender: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:16:52
To:
Reply-To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CWSG] Re: Crumar Mojo - Brief Follow-up

To have a separate output for the rotor is a very good idea because you
could possibly control the low frequency levels more independently into a P.A.
mix.

I had the Numa out on a rental Sunday night ad the sound guy was
disappointed that there was not a separate out for the lower manual. So with the sim
on the Mojo, I presume you could send 800Hz and below into a house system
independently.

As much as I like the stereo effect of something like the Numa sim. I am
realizing that in a sense it is not practical through a lot of house P.A.
systems because you are never going to have stereo out front. So it actually
makes more sense to send two mono signals if you have an upper and lower
sim.

The 20 different modeled organs are also intriguing. Are they easily
accessible? It is a little bit interesting that the 1965 organ has crosstalk. No
mylar cap organ I ever heard has much if any. But it would be interesting
to hear the differences.

These reviews have gotten my curiousity, that's for sure. But something
about not actually being able to play one is frustrating.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]