From rafael2pop@yahoo.com.ar Mon Oct 08 08:07:39 2007
Subject:Re: re New Preamp Product News - ???????? - same case?

Hey Tony , thanks for pointing my mistake.

Almost unforgettable error :( , mostly when trying to
be precise.

It happened when editing the message in a hurry and
saddly added these words : (ALL TUBE ).

In fact what I formerly tried to compare was the chain
WITH or WITHOUT a TUBE pre.

Let's say that my doubt was about what would happen
comparatively, if putting one piece of solid state in
the beginning , conversely a solid state signal ,
almost always available, but feeding the AMA.

Just that.

Put the question in other terms would be : may be that
a solid state PREamp, plus an AMA unit, would get the
same grind and growl that will come from an ALL TUBE
chain (pre SE + AMA) ?

Hope to be understood.

Bests,

Rafael

--------------

It's clear that

Re: re New Preamp Product News - ???????? - same
case?
Posted by: "tonysounds" tonysounds@yahoo.com
tonysounds
Sun Oct 7, 2007 5:09 pm (PST)
Now I'm totally confused Rafel: you wrote

rafael2pop wrote:

TUBE preamp + TUBE amp ===> ss POWER
What seems to be better would be to have this
schema:

PREamp + powerAMP (all TUBE) ====> solid state
POWERamp

I interpret both schemes to be the same thing
(which is what Speakeasy has done: tube pre into Tube
AMA into solid state power amp.

____________________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Noticias
Leé la columna de "El Chavo" Fucks y encontrá una visión distinta de las Elecciones Presidenciales 2007 en:
Url: http://ar.news.yahoo.com/elecciones2007/opinion/132/siga-el-baile