From ttgomez@hotmail.com Mon Feb 20 21:44:19 2006
Subject:Re: Do I need the "Barker"?

Oh Great. So now I NEED one of those amps with the spinning thing in
it. And I don't even gig!
To think I let slip a 2yr old KBR-3D for $500. He was guitar player.

>
> Regards,
>
> -BW
>
> --
> Bruce Wahler
> Design Consultant
> Ashby Solutions™ http://consult.ashbysolutions.com
> 978.386.7389 voice/fax
> bruce@...
>
> At 08:40 PM 2/20/2006 +0000, you wrote:
>
> >--- In CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com, Bruce Wahler wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Phil,
> >>
> >quite the same. That's why the Barker works better with a Leslie or
> >MS setup -- or even a Rotosphere or RT-20.
> >>
> >
> >So does that mean the Barker's not worthwhile unless the spinning
> >stage is AFTER it? ie. I rely on the internal sim. I have a CX3 with
> >an SEShotglass. I was considering upgrading the SE to a
> >Classic/Barker, but my amp is just a powered mixer (Sunn!) and a
> >Peavey cab. Thanks.
> >Trinidad
> >
> >To unsubscribe, send email to: CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>