From djacques@csulb.edu Fri Apr 28 09:51:09 2006
Subject:RE: Speakeasy RoadBox III+

Steve already makes such a beast in his Roadbox Leslie... However, due to
the mechanics and sonics, it requires a taller, and heavier cabinet. The
MKIII is a different beast altogether...

I believe that people need to see the MKIII for what it is... not as a
device to replicate the "classic Leslie sound"... but as a whole new sound
development in the history of organ music.
-----Original Message-----
From: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com]On
Behalf Of Ryan Stroup
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:04 AM
To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CWSG] Speakeasy RoadBox III+

Just out of curiousity, what is the difference between the MKII and
MKIII. Can all the features of the MKIII be put in the taller cabinet
with the lower rotor as well?

Another question I have, would it be possible to design a lower rotor
that would fit inside the MKIII cabinet?

These are just questions I'm merely curious about. For those who
thought maybe the reason I'm asking is because I'm unhappy with my
Pro-145, the answer is NO! lol I still love the sound.

--
Ryan

To unsubscribe, send email to: CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

SPONSORED LINKS Music instrument stores Native instruments Hammond
organs

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

a.. Visit your group "CloneWheel" on the web.

b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]