From groovecake@yahoo.com Tue Nov 09 14:38:42 2004
Subject:Re: Why did Hammond get the virtual B3 right?

Schel,

You are darn right about the affordability of the B4!
Factor in a few hundred $ for a laptop and a good
soundcard and you are pretty much there!

Mitch

--- schel_d_sullivan
wrote:

>
> --- In CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com, M T
> wrote:
> > Dave - trust me. The Xk-3 is a major step forward
> from
> > the B4. Take it from someone who used the B4 all
> the
> > time, live and in studio. The Xk-3 is a superious
> > piece all around.
> >
> > Oh...the B4 pedal tones were weak.
> >
> > I was using an M-Audio Quattro with ASIO drivers.
> >
> > Yes. I used both the B4 and the Xk-3 through an
> amp
> > with the internal simulators and through my 147.
> Xk-3
> > wins hands down.
> >
> > Mitch
>
>
> Ive been using B4 for over a year now. Its really
> good and holds its
> own in a rock mix very well, good leslie sim. I
> havent Auditioned a
> XK-3 yet, but I trust the opinions of many
> clonewheelers when they
> say XK-3 is superior. I cant want to audition one
> and then wish I
> could afford it!!
>
> with that being said, If one allready has a
> copmuter/sound card and
> the inclination to "go soft" then you cant beat B4
> for $99 U.S.
>
> Nothing comes as close when considering "Hammond
> Bang > for your
> buck"
>
> P.S. If I had the funds, Id likey buy XK-3
> site-unseen, just from
> the opinions of a few here that I have great respect
> for.
>
> Schel
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com