From harjoy@elknet.net Wed May 12 18:52:05 2004
Subject:Re: Thanks for all the XK-3 info - how about Internal Leslie simulation?
From: David Jacques
>You know, Al Goff once told me something that has proven extremely wise.
When I was thinking about recapping one of my B3's, he asked if I liked the
sound of the organ. I told him I did but hoped that it could sound "better",
(whatever that means). Instead of selling me on a complete re-capping kit,
he suggested that I keep the organ the way she was instead of taking the
chance that it could sound "better".
You were lucky indeed to have been given that advice.
When I was having some lackluster sound and slight "lack of liveliness" in my '55 C 3, someone at Goff's had only the suggestion to recap the TG. I had heard some Hammond owners suggest this could actually make things worse.
I could not talk Goff into rebuilding my preamp. Nor two others on the web Hammond shops.
I got a preamp rebuild by tech at former Hammond dealer. The change was absolutely unbeleiveable and amazing. I did get a quote from Keyboard specialists that was about as high as some people sell C3's for.
Harold
Three B3's later I learned that the sound and playability of each organ is
vastly different. They all have their unique personalities. Do I love
playing one more than the others? Not necessarily.. I play them all pretty
much on how my mood strikes me at the time.
I just went through the momentary "gear-lust" that many of you are now going
through. Yes, I will try the XK3 and see if it does deserve the investment.
But is a nominal difference worth $2000?
Also, what about gig playability? For those who perform with clones once you
feel comfortable with your board does it make sense to upgrade? For many I
am sure it does. I don't know yet.
If I was playing a Nord and wanted two sets of real drawbars, I would
probably purchase an XK3 above the CX3 (if indeed the Leslie sim is at least
as good as the CX3's.) From playing the Prototype at NAMM I did not hear
such a markable difference between the "sound" of the CX3 and XK3.. Maybe
they have improved it that much since then. We will soon find out.
Of course you all will be the first to know if I join the list of converts..
As for the analogy of the "old girlfriend", someone better check Steve's
attic..
DJ
-----Original Message-----
* Tony and Mitch,
I too appreciate all of the work you guys have done
feeding us information on the XK-3. My previous post
pleading for some negative comments was strictly
selfish, as I think I've only owned my Electro for
8 months or so. T, I know you've been a big supporter
of the Electro so I was thinkin', "Oh no, say it ain't so!"
As in the past you've been honest and objective in
your reviews. A lot of what you recommended helped
me make decisions and turned out to be right on, at least
for my tastes, so I'm having difficulty taking what you
have to say with a grain of salt.
So... let's say I've psychologically taken the plunge
towards the XK-3 by resolving my cognitive dissonance
(heh-heh): I'm with Eric, I don't want to part with
the Electro. But I also don't want the Electro to end up
like an ex-girlfriend. You know, "Honey, we've been through
a lot and had some great times, I hope we can still be friends
and keep in touch..." and then put her in the attic for safe
keeping so nobody else can have her (...uh, by her I mean
the Electro). I'd prefer to keep the Electro as part
of my rig, so I'm interested to here how or if it could
perch on top of the XK-3.
That brings me to my first question:
1. How does the XK-3 implement the upper/lower manuals? If
I want to use 2 manuals for some songs, I'd want to have
percussion on the "upper" manual, but if the XK-3 is
physically underneath, it then becomes the lower manual.
Does the XK-3 allow configuration of the upper/lower manual
in this way? Ideally, I'd like to save this per preset since
sometimes I'd be using the XK-3 as a single (upper) manual
and would want the percussion back on the XK-3 manual.
I remember this was an issue with the Electro when I tried
to use another keyboard physically above the Electro as the
upper manual. I would have had to switch MIDI channels that
were assigned for the upper/lower manuals since they were
global settings that couldn't be saved to a preset. I guess
this isn't an issue if the XK-3 allows you to assign percussion
to both upper and lower manuals (hopefully this question makes
sense, it was hard to word).
2. Also, do you know how HS will deal with software/firmware
upgrades for the XK-3 (i.e., bug fixes and updates)? In the
past this has been a chip that you had to buy.
I think that's another reason I want to hold on to the Electro.
From all accounts, it sounds like the bar has been raised for
Clavia. This could burn a fire under them to make improvements
for the next OS. I'd hate to let go of it and find out that
Clavia came out with a free update that vastly improved the sound
or functionality of the organ. I love the Electro and can't imagine
it sounding too much better, but allowing more tweakability would
be a welcome improvement. I'm not holding my breath, but it is a
possibility.
Sorry for the tedious questions...
TIA,
Steve
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
To unsubscribe, send email to: CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CloneWheel/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]