From list@sevush.com Mon Mar 15 12:20:34 2004
Subject:RE: Korg CX-3: Roland KC 350 or Motion Sound KT-80?

I used to own a KC500. It had good bass but the mids and highs were very,
very harsh. I use one KT80 for practices and jams and two at gigs. They're
great in stereo, but even mono they're a good amp.

I have not used the KC350, I assume it's a newer model of the KC300. I've
used a KC300 at some jams and found them to be incredibly underpowered. I
have never had to turn my KT80 past half. I will not tell you it's as clear
in the highs as my Mackie SRM450s, but if I had to pick between the two I'd
go w/the KT80 in a second. They're small, light and if you shop around, the
same price. I paid $380 for my first KT80 for a B stock from music123.com
and paid $300 on eBay for my second. The two of them together are the size,
weight and price of a Twin Reverb and sound amazing in stereo.

> Hi guys,asking again.(would love to have some replies)
>
> Do you guys prefer a KT-80 over the KC 350 for the tube thing? Is it
> worth it? Does it sounds that different?
>
> I got a pretty good deal for the KC-350 ($ 399 taxes incl.)but
> haven't decided yet.
>
> I've used a Roland amp.in the past with a Roland RS-9 (organs
> tweaked) and a a Rotosphere MKII and it sounded pretty well. The
> Roland amp. never let me down.
>
> I'll also need to amplify a synth, besides the CX-3.
>
> Thanks
>
> To unsubscribe, send email to: CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>