From ynottnaro@yahoo.com Sun May 25 17:34:59 2003
Subject:RE: Motion Sound Low Pro

lol....REALLY?????? I couldn't carry the lo-pro with
one hand unless real handles (instead of the 'scoop'
style presently used) were installed and were more
strategically placed. And again, the weight/tone
ratio is something to consider.

You dont get tone on a diet....
T
--- bilyod@msn.com wrote:
> The p3t and low pro seperately { 2 pieces) are the
> easiest way to carry them around. One person can
> carry each section with one hand.
>
> ------ Original Message -----
>
> From: barry reynolds
> Sent: Sat, May 24, 2003 10:17am
> To:
> Subject: Re: [CWSG] Motion Sound Low Pro
> If you have enough money to consider a 145/142, then
> you might consider getting a Motion Sound Pro145.
> It is a single piece update of the Pro3t/LowPro
> combination. there is a pic in the photos section.
>
> On the otherhand, I once simultaneously played a
> Hammond a100 through a Leslie 145 and a
> Pro3t/LowPro. I then listened to them separately.
> As good as Motion Sound stuff is, the real Leslie
> was significantly better to my ears. The cons of
> the 145 are weight, size, and frequent need to mic
> in many band situations.
>
> The signature Hammond sound is really
> Hammond/Leslie.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
> To unsubscribe, send email to:
> CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com