From breynold@usc.edu Tue Jun 10 15:37:44 2003
Subject:RE: Thurston Howl III

But if you are always going into a tube Leslie, then the classic alone will
do the trick. If the 302c is a solid state Leslie (with a 1/4 input?),
then I'd decide depending on the music you play, as per the previous responses.

At 04:25 PM 6/10/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>I went with the Stereo Rack Classic/Howler version (OUCH, $800+) for my
>SE. Its nice to have as I use the Howler whenever I play in a Classic
>Rock Band and the classic when I play in my Jazz/Blues bands. So it just
>depends on how flexible you need your sound to be. As I have said
>before, without distortion, the classic has a much nicer tone than the
>Howler. I use the digital overdrive from my CX3 for my quieter gigs. The
>Howler certainly does the trick for the Santana, Deep Purple, etc.
>songs. Is it worth the cost... For me it is....
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: unclehumuna [mailto:mfadem@languageline.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 10:58 AM
>To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [CWSG] Thurston Howl III
>
>Alright.
>
>You convinced me.
>I'm going to get an SE to run between my Leslie 302c, and whichever
>clone I decide on.
>
>Since I play mostly blues, R&B, and old school soul (and some jazz),
>I'm planning on getting the "Classic" tube configuration.
>
>I also do occasional rock gigs (Allman's/Santana/Dead type stuff).
>
>My questions concern the "Howler" configuration:
>
>How good is it?
>How much does it add?
>Is it worth paying the extra $250 ($140 extra for the rack version,
>$110 for the switch) to get both?
>
>Thanks All
>mf
>
>Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
><http://rd.yahoo.com/M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705
>031959:HM/A=1564416/R=0/SIG=11ti81skc/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?mq
>so=60164797&partid=3170658>
>
><http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egrou