From brianfores@hotmail.com Tue Jan 07 18:25:08 2003
Subject:Re: new member


Hey, thanks for the post. I actually own a rhodes, and it is great, and, ya
know, i've had it with digital pianos too! LOL I have a kawai mp 9000. It's
action is one of the best, but, the sound just leaves me cold (no pun
intended).
But, what i was really trying to get at is, would you rather play an
original CX3 from 70s/80s, or the new digital CX3? And why?
Btw, what kind of music do you play?
-brian

>From: melvinnich@aol.com
>Reply-To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
>To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [CWSG] new member
>Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 21:01:19 EST
>
>In a message dated 1/7/03 8:46:24 PM, brianfores@hotmail.com writes:
>
><< Somehow, the old korg cx3 or bx3 is acceptable, b/c, it's analog, and
>that
>somehow makes it, "it's own instrument." >>
>
>Dear Brian,
>
>I guess the kind of music I play figures into why I like the CX3, so I
>don't
>think I have any absolute opinion on whether it matters that it is not its
>own instrument.
>
>I thought of an example that might mean something to you or somebody.
>I know that a Rhodes is "its own instrument" (more than the Korg CX3) but
>if
>I had to do my show with ONLY one keyboard and the choice was between the
>CX3
>and a Rhodes, believe it or not I would choose the Korg CX3. It has to do
>with the kind of music I am playing as much as with anything else.
>
>(P. S. I've had it with digital pianos; I find them unpleasant to play, so
>a
>Rhodes would go above those.)
>

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus