From sevush@rcn.com Tue Apr 08 08:54:12 2003
Subject:RE: Mackie SRM 450 with Pro3t

Yes, I have done that. Note that it's effectively the same as a 'Y' cable -
no buffering.

> I notice that the SRM 450 has two parallel inputs. Can you use
> two keyboards into 1 SRM 450 without a mixer?
>
> BB
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dan S
> To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 8:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [CWSG] Mackie SRM 450 with Pro3t
>
> I don't know about the 41, but I have a 32c and it's definitely
> not as clear
> and clean as my Mackie SRM450. I *wish* the Mackie had the
> preamp/mixer of
> the 32c.
>
> Anyway, I am fairly confident the Mackie will make a better impression
> dispersion and frequency wise. I put the Mackie up on a speaker
> stand and it
> gets "out there" and sounds great. I put the 32c up on the same speaker
> stand and it didn't sound as good. I think the Barbetta needs
> to be placed
> more like a combo amp, on the ground tilted up or maybe on a chair.
>
> As for the ease of placing the Pro3 on top, I've heard someone
> here say they
> do it. Maybe secure it w/a strap?
>
> I would weigh sound quality, size and weight over its performance as a
> stand. You can always use an X stand for the MS
>
> > I am currently running my VK7 through a Speakeasy and into a
> > Pro 3T and a Barbetta 41. I also play a Triton into the
> > Barbetta for non-organ sounds. The Pro 3T fits neatly on the
> > Barbetta. The problem is that I am not sure that I am happy
> > with the Barbetta for strings/pads. It seems to lack some
> > highs unless I turn up the treble which then causes an
> > audible hiss. (It sounded fine at Guitar Center.) I am
> > thinking about selling the Barbetta and getting a Mackie SRM
> > 450 which I have used for vocals and sounds nice and gets
> > good reviews on this forum. The question is where do I put
> > the Pro 3T if I go with the Mackie?
> > Anyone else have a SRM 450/Pro 3T rig? How do you set it up?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bob Baker
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: barry reynolds
> > To: CloneWheel@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 8:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CWSG] Digest Number 1129
> >
> > I know I am preaching to the choir, but when someone says a clone
> > "doesn't cut through" in a band mix, I start to think that
> > clone must be more authentic. With real hammonds in rock
> > settings, the best side musicians know to get quieter during
> > the solos. Hammonds are not meant to sound like Dx7's. Most
> > of the time, the listening public will miss that Hammond glue
> > when it is absent, but they don't turn their heads like when
> > the guitar or sax starts wailin.'
> >
> > One obvious giveaway to a poor imitation is when the organ
> > cuts through bright and clear.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send email to:
> > CloneWheel-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com