From rees@almaden.ibm.com Thu Oct 31 16:32:04 2002
Subject:Re:BX3 stand etc.

GK,

Since you have both...

How does the BX-3's keyboard action compare to the CX-3?

I'm not referring to the new Shallow/Deep triggering stuff in OS V2,
rather the new physical keybed itself (waterfall keys, etc). Does the
new waterfall keybed add to the "hammond" experience?

--- In CloneWheel@y..., organize wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I own a BX3 and CX3
>
> 1-Yes, it is easy to assemble it is composed of 4
> pieces which come apart(the sides/legs are 2 pieces and 2
support beams)
> and bolt together and the fit is excellent.
> 2The "shelf" above the upper keyboard is the same size
> as the CX3 and either keyboard will overlap the drawbars a bit
> but they are still accessible.
>
> If you have any other questions let me know
>
> GK
>
> >Message: 22
> > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:41:24 -0000
> > From: "b3bobster"
> >Subject: BX-3 Question
> >
> >I know there's at least one (late-model) BX-3 owner in this group,
so
> >here's a couple of questions:
> >
> >1) do you gig with the standard BX-3 stand? i.e., does the stand
come
> >apart reasonably for transport?
> >
> >2) I know the upper "shelf" on the BX-3 (you know, above the
> >drawbars) is wider/deeper than the one on the CX-3, but is it deep
> >enough to hold a small additional keyboard (e.g., a Roland XP-30 or
> >even an Electro 61)?
> >
> >Thanks - Bob
> >
> >/terms/
>
> --