From k2mojo@groovedaddies.com Mon Jan 28 18:34:23 2002
Subject:RE: showing horn and rotor of motion sound products

I probably wasn't being clear, so I'll try again. IMHO, the original Pro-3,
all by itself, is somewhat lame. Apparently I wasn't the only one who
thought that, so they came out with the Pro-3T, which is much improved with
the addition of the tube preamp. An original Pro-3 with a Speakeasy would
be even cooler than just a Pro-3T, and even cooler yet would be a Pro-3T
with a Speakeasy.
However, if I remember correctly, the original question was "How do the two
units compare for sound and general usability? Is there a significant
difference between the two models? If I have an opportunity to get the Pro
3 for a good price, should I take it, or wait until I can pay the additional
price for the Pro 3T?" (end quote) John Fisher might know something more
here, but I'm pretty sure the only significant difference between the two is
the addition of the tube preamp.
Before I heard of the Speakeasy, I would have steered someone away from the
Pro-3 in favor of a Pro-3T. Now, with the Speakeasy around and fairly low
prices for an original Pro-3, I think that might be a decent way to go now.
I haven't followed them real close lately, but the price difference between
a used Pro-3 and a used Pro-3T was $125-175; I'd put the price difference
into a Speakeasy.

Ed Fliege
k2mojo@groovedaddies.com
www.groovedaddies.com

> Wait aminnit Ed . i use a Speakeasy Preamp with both the Pro3t and KBR3d
> together and I had two pastors who were visisting the church that morning
> willing to spend the money i did for that same set up. MikeW.

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.319 / Virus Database: 178 - Release Date: 1/28/2002